The connections are already built
A good share of the work in the first automation goes into connecting your tools and understanding how you store information. That work is not repeated: the second process starts from a base that already exists.
Automation live in 7 days
Our implementation method makes sure your solution is live and delivering value in under seven days.
Seven days from the first call
Not because we rush, but because we narrow the scope until it fits into a week.
The most common mistake in automation is starting with a three-month project touching five departments. By the time results are due, the process has changed, whoever asked for it has moved on and nobody can say whether it helped.
We work the other way round: we pick one specific process, get it running in a week and measure it. If the result is there, we move to the next. If it is not, we have lost a week rather than a quarter.
01
Free diagnosis
The process starts with a free diagnosis to identify your bottlenecks and automation opportunities. We look at speed, looping tasks and manual work.
02
Solution design
We design the automation and put it through rigorous testing in a private environment to guarantee it works properly before touching your operation.
03
Implementation
We deploy the final version in your live environment and switch it on so the automation delivers immediate results.
04
Assisted follow-up
We set up continuous monitoring to track how the automations perform and apply optimisations that secure maximum ROI.
What we need from you
Less than people expect, but not nothing. These three things make the difference between an automation that holds and one that breaks on the first odd day.
- Half an hour from whoever knows the process. Not the director: whoever runs it and knows the exceptions
- Access to the tools involved. With the minimum permissions the flow needs
- Someone who can say yes. Someone to approve the design before rollout
Nothing else. No training your team on new tools, no changing the software you already use, no pausing operations while we build.
How we know whether it worked
Before building anything we measure the starting point: how long the process takes today, how many times a month it runs and how often something has to be corrected. Without that initial number, any later improvement is just an impression.
After that we track three things: the time the process now consumes, how many runs complete without human intervention and how many need someone to step in and fix them.
Ese último dato es el importante y el que casi nadie mide. Una automatización que se ejecuta sola el 60 % de las veces y obliga a revisar el resto no está ahorrando tiempo: lo está cambiando de sitio.
And after the first process, what?
The second one usually costs less than the first. Here is why.
We already know how you work
The slow part of the diagnosis is understanding the exceptions: the cases that do not follow the rule and that nobody has documented. After the first project that map is already drawn.
You have a number to compare against
With the first process measured, choosing the next stops being a hunch. You pick where the most hours are at stake, not where the complaint is loudest.
There is no obligation to chain projects. Some clients automate one thing, find that is enough and do not come back until the following year. That is fine by us: if the process that took four hours a week no longer does, the job is done.
What we do advise against is the opposite: trying to automate everything at once in the first month. Every automation changes how your team works, and teams absorb one change at a time. Going faster than people can take in is the surest way for the system to end up switched off.
Let's start with the diagnosis
It is free and with no obligation. In one session we spot what you can automate first.